Abstract-Vol-12-Issue-4 Cihan Necmi Günal, Halil Peçe

Risk Governance in Resilient Cities and Artificial Intelligence: A New Political Stakeholder?

1Cihan Necmi Günal*, Halil Peçe** Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and Public Administration Kocaeli University, Türkiye, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., ORCID: 0000-0002- 6541-623X * Assistant Professor, Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Erzurum Technical University, Türkiye, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., ORCID: 0000-0002-3861-0651**

 

Abstract: Cities face increasingly complex risks, from climate extremes to pandemics, while deploying artificial intelligence (AI) across urban operations. This article asks whether AI should be treated as a non-human stakeholder in urban risk governance. Integrating risk governance, anticipatory governance, and Actor–Network Theory, we conduct a comparative qualitative analysis of three city cases: Calgary (climate resilience and infrastructure planning), Copenhagen (public-building energy management), and Kansas City (AI-enhanced mobility). Across cases, AI systems shape problem framing, prioritize interventions, and execute microdecisions in real time, shifting from instruments to delegates and, at times, co-governors. We propose an AI-as-actor spectrum anchored to core risk-governance tasks and derive indicators of “effective agency” (e.g., automated problem framing, resource-allocation authority, auditability/contestability). Findings show that AI’s influence scales with how early models enter the governance cycle, how tightly outputs are coupled to execution, and how contestable algorithmic “passage points” are. Policy implications include public algorithm registers, ex ante impact assessments, human-in-the-loop thresholds with escalation rights, decision logging, and periodic audits to safeguard transparency, accountability, and equity. Reconceptualizing governance to include non-human actants does not confer personhood on AI; it clarifies its embedded role and the institutional tools needed to govern it.

Keywords:Artificial Intelligence (AI), Resilient City, Actor-Network Theory, Risk Governance, Anticipatory Governance, Smart Cities.

 

Page: 73-91  Size: 810 KB  Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51659/josi.25.268

JOSI Publications

Volume 12 - 2025
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 11 - 2024
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 10 - 2023
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 9 - 2022
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 8 - 2021
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 7 - 2020
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 6 - 2019
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 5 - 2018
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 4 - 2017
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 3 - 2016
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 2 - 2015
Issue 4
Issue 3
Issue 2
Issue 1
Volume 1 - 2014
Issue 2
Issue 1
Publication Information

 ♦ Publisher

Management & Business Academy

Print ISSN: 2056-9122 

Online ISSN: 2056-9130

MBAcademy